翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Buck Herzog
・ Buck Hill
・ Buchtar Tabuni
・ Buchtel
・ Buchtel (surname)
・ Buchtel College of Arts and Sciences
・ Buchtel Community Learning Center
・ Buchtel, Ohio
・ Buchteln
・ Buchter
・ Buchter News
・ Buchtienia
・ Buchu Monastery
・ Buchukovtsi
・ Buchwald
Buchwald v. Paramount
・ Buchwaldoboletus
・ Buchwaldoboletus lignicola
・ Buchwaldskopf
・ Buchwald–Hartwig amination
・ Buchy
・ Buchy, Moselle
・ Buchy, Seine-Maritime
・ Buchyna
・ Buchères
・ Buciara
・ Buciara bipartita
・ Bucida
・ Bucida buceras
・ Bucida ophiticola


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Buchwald v. Paramount : ウィキペディア英語版
Buchwald v. Paramount
''Buchwald v. Paramount'' (1990) , was a breach of contract lawsuit filed and decided in California in which humorist and writer Art Buchwald alleged that Paramount Pictures stole his script idea and turned it into the 1988 movie ''Coming to America''. Buchwald won the lawsuit and was awarded damages, and then accepted a settlement from Paramount before any appeal took place.
The decision was important mainly for the court's determination in the damages phase of the trial that Paramount used "unconscionable" means of determining how much to pay authors, which is widely called "Hollywood Accounting." Paramount claimed, and provided accounting evidence to support the claim, that despite the movie's $288 million in revenues, it had earned no net profit, according to the definition of "net profit" in Buchwald's contract, and hence Buchwald was owed nothing. The court agreed with Buchwald's argument that this was "unconscionable" and therefore invalid. Fearing a loss if it appealed, and the subsequent implications of the unconscionability decision across all its other contracts, Paramount settled for $900,000.〔(http://articles.latimes.com/1992-03-17/local/me-3895_1_net-profit Buchwald, Partner Win $900,000 From Studio)〕 The case was the subject of a 1992 book, ''Fatal Subtraction: The Inside Story of Buchwald v. Paramount'' by Pierce O'Donnell, the lawyer who represented Buchwald, and ''Los Angeles Times'' reporter Dennis McDougal.
==Timeline==
In 1982, Buchwald wrote a screen treatment titled "It's A Crude, Crude World" (later renamed "King for a Day") that was pitched to Jeffrey Katzenberg of Paramount, with the intention of starring Eddie Murphy, who was under contract to Paramount at the time. According to the court documents, the synopsis for "King for a Day" was:
Paramount optioned the treatment in early 1983 and commissioned several unsuccessful scripts from several screenwriters. John Landis was considered as the director from time to time. After two years of development hell, Paramount decided to abandon the project in March 1985.
In May 1986, Paramount's rival Warner Bros. optioned Buchwald's treatment.
In the summer of 1987, Paramount began to develop a movie that was credited as being based on a story by Eddie Murphy, and which was to be directed by John Landis. The story outline was similar to Buchwald's story idea, and to the failed Paramount scripts that had been based on it.
In January 1988, Warner Bros. canceled their version of Buchwald's project, citing the Paramount project.
When the movie ''Coming to America'' was released by Paramount in 1988, Eddie Murphy was given sole story credit. Buchwald was not paid, or even credited as the story writer. Buchwald sued Paramount for breach of contract, as his contract with Paramount stated that he would be paid a certain amount if his treatment were made into a film.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Buchwald v. Paramount」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.